top of page

AI in Resumes and Cover Letters: Unfair Advantage or Wake-Up Call for Recruitment?

The Emergence of AI in Job Applications

The concept of AI has evolved from the realms of science fiction into everyday reality, now firmly embedded within many aspects of our lives. For job seekers, AI provides an intriguing way to stand out in a crowded job market. With the availability of platforms such as ChatGPT, it’s now possible to craft compelling CVs and cover letters, maximising a candidate’s chances of catching the attention of recruiters.

ChatGPT uses machine learning to generate human-like text based on the input it’s given. This presents job seekers with an opportunity to polish their applications, potentially going beyond their writing capabilities. But as the use of AI in job applications grows, it sparks an interesting debate: does using AI constitute an unfair advantage, or is it merely a clever use of available tools?

Perspective: Innovation and Efficiency

Innovation has always been the driving force behind progress. Throughout history, new tools and technologies have consistently changed how we approach tasks, from farming with tractors to drafting documents on computers. The emergence of AI tools such as ChatGPT could be seen as a continuation of this trend.

AI can offer a fresh pair of 'eyes' on a job application, providing insights and suggestions that a candidate may not have considered. Furthermore, AI can help candidates to present their skills and experiences more effectively, using natural language processing to match the tone and style preferred by recruiters.

Some may argue that using AI tools for job applications is no different from using a spell-checker or grammar tool. After all, both provide automated assistance to help the user present their best self. In essence, AI is just another tool helping job seekers to be efficient and effective.

Perspective: Deception and Authenticity

On the other side of the debate is the question of authenticity. CVs and cover letters are traditionally seen as personal expressions of a candidate's skills, experiences, and aspirations. By using AI, a candidate's voice might be overshadowed by the 'voice' of the AI. There's a risk that recruiters could be impressed by the articulation of the AI, rather than the actual qualifications of the candidate.

There's also the ethical question to consider: is it deceptive to use an AI tool to enhance a job application? Some might argue it's misleading, as it could give an inflated impression of a candidate's capabilities. The perception of fairness also comes into play. Job seekers who don’t have access to such technology might feel disadvantaged, creating a potential inequality in the recruitment process.

A Balanced Approach

Perhaps the key to resolving this debate lies in finding a balance. It's undeniable that AI tools can provide valuable support in crafting job applications. At the same time, it's essential to ensure that the use of AI doesn’t overshadow a candidate's true abilities and potential.

Transparency could be a solution. If candidates are open about their use of AI tools, it could level the playing field, allowing recruiters to make informed decisions. It could also stimulate a conversation about the growing role of AI in the recruitment process, encouraging both recruiters and candidates to explore the potential and pitfalls of these technologies.

Reimagining Recruitment in an AI-Driven World The growing use of AI in job applications may indeed signify a broader need to revisit and rethink traditional recruitment methods. If more and more candidates begin to use AI tools like ChatGPT, the conventional ways of assessing candidates based on their CVs and cover letters may no longer suffice. This isn’t necessarily a problematic scenario – it's an opportunity for change and progress.

Instead of seeing AI as a threat to fairness, we could view it as a catalyst for transforming the hiring process. AI-driven tools could lead us to focus less on the glossiness of a CV and more on the actual skills and aptitudes of a candidate. In essence, it could herald a shift towards skills-based hiring.

Skills-based hiring is a recruitment approach that prioritises a candidate's skills and competencies over their academic qualifications or prior job titles. This method has the potential to level the playing field. It offers an opportunity for candidates to demonstrate their capabilities directly, rather than relying on a written document that may now be partially crafted by AI.

Adopting this approach could address some of the concerns about fairness and deception. It could ensure that candidates are evaluated on their actual abilities, rather than the prowess of their AI tool. It could also promote diversity, by enabling candidates from unconventional backgrounds or those without access to AI to have an equal shot at job opportunities. A shift towards skills-based hiring would require concerted efforts from employers. Traditional recruitment processes may need to be realigned, and new tools and strategies would need to be deployed. But the benefits could be considerable. A recruitment process that truly reflects a candidate's skills and potential can lead to more effective hires, improved diversity, and a workforce better equipped for the future.

Conclusion As AI continues to advance and play an increasingly significant role in job applications, it's clear that recruitment processes will need to adapt. Whether we view the use of AI in job applications as innovative or deceptive will largely depend on our willingness to engage in open dialogues, reassess traditional norms, and adapt to evolving realities. By embracing skills-based hiring, we can not only level the playing field but also create a more inclusive, effective, and future-oriented recruitment landscape.



bottom of page